All the information about withdrawals, accounts, Secondary Market and other topics can be found in this FAQ blog post. In case you still have questions, you can contact us at info@evoestate.com
Update from the originator:
The originator is very pleased to inform you that d.i.i. Deutsche Investment Immobilien AG has successfully completed the GREVEN - MÜNSTERLAND project and repaid the loan amount plus interest to the account of our payment service provider.
Your investment including interest will therefore be paid out to you in the next few days. Please note that it may take up to 10 working days for the money to reach your account.
A new document containing updates of the project has been uploaded.
Update from the originator:
The project developer would like to keep you up to date with regard to the progress of the Bielefeld project.
The quarterly report can be found in the "Documents" section.
Update from the originator:
The project developer would like to keep you up to date with regard to the progress of the GREVEN-MÜNSTERLAND project.
The quarterly report for the period from 1 January 2021 to 31 March 2021 can be found in the "documents" tab.
Update from the developer:
The rents in the property were constant in the 4th quarter of 2020. An apartment that became available in December was not rented again on the reporting date. On the reporting date, the monthly rent was € 14,520.78.
There was no scope for further rent increases within the legal possibilities (including § 558 BGB).
As of the reporting date, the property had 1 apartment vacant.
A new document was added regarding more numbers.
Update from the developer:
The rents for the property increased in the 3rd quarter of 2020 with € 121.61 from € 14,810.77 per month to € 14,932.38 due to fluctuation (1 residential unit). There was no rent increase within the legal possibilities (including § 558 BGB). The property was fully rented as of this date.
Update from the developer:
The rent in the property remained constant in the 2nd quarter of 2020 at € 14,810.77 per month because there was no fluctuation that took place. The price for rent increase within the legal possibilities (including § 558 BGB) did not exist. The property was fully let on the reporting timeframe.